<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: London haze</title>
	<atom:link href="http://weblog.blogads.com/348/london-haze/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://weblog.blogads.com/348/london-haze</link>
	<description></description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 30 Aug 2008 12:10:58 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Douglas Arellanes</title>
		<link>http://weblog.blogads.com/348/london-haze#comment-86</link>
		<dc:creator>Douglas Arellanes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Nov 1999 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">#comment-86</guid>
		<description>Hm. Maybe I'm 15 seconds behind the curve, as usual, but it seems to me that BlogShares would be a pretty good and reliable pricing mechanism for BlogAds ads.

I just read a James Surowiecki (sp?) article in the New Yorker (they come late out hereabout the rise of imaginary markets, and they do indeed seem to capture the best thoughts in a crowd.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hm. Maybe I&#8217;m 15 seconds behind the curve, as usual, but it seems to me that BlogShares would be a pretty good and reliable pricing mechanism for BlogAds ads.</p>
<p>I just read a James Surowiecki (sp?) article in the New Yorker (they come late out hereabout the rise of imaginary markets, and they do indeed seem to capture the best thoughts in a crowd.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
