|
Archives: July 2003
NEW: Credit card payment option
Buyers of ads above $25 can now pay for their blogads purchases with their credit card. PayPal will remain an option as well. For a discussion on the rationale and a few of our users' opinion, please see this recent posting by Henry.
[4] comments (3591 views) | link
Payment info now available for blogads users
Log in, go to your adstrip manage page and check out the last two columns in each row. You will see how much you can expect for each ad sold. If we have paid you already, the payment date is also shown. To access payment information for ads that have expired, look for the link at the bottom of the ad manage page.
Yes, there is no aggregation of past earnings. Yes, we are not adding up how much we will transfer you next month. These are to come. Treat this little development as a first step.
[5] comments (3351 views) | link
Henry on vacation...
I'll be on the road for the next two weeks, passing through DC, Black Mountain and Chapel Hill. If you need anything urgently, please contact Miklos in Hungary. His number, from the US, is 011 361 328-0602.
[5] comments (3338 views) | link
Ad industry thrashes around
WSJ.com: "Even the biggest marketers are struggling with the tough economy, the sharp increase in ad clutter and audience fragmentation. Now some see boutique agencies as more nimble -- and cheaper -- alternatives. Sun, for example, has used J. Walter Thompson for the past three years to craft its ads, but the company is eager to cut costs and believes smaller agencies may help it generate more buzz with its advertising." Ahh, so that is why we're getting calls. :)
[4] comments (2981 views) | link
Expiry bug mending
We've identified a complex bug in our ad expiry processes, which means that some ads have not expired quickly enough. We originally misdiagnosed the problem. Net result: free page impressions for some advertisers. Most of the ads are fixed and the rest should be fixed by tomorrow. Thank you to Atrios, Moxie, David and Hugh for flagging the bug.
[4] comments (3148 views) | link
Old advertising and New York advertising
Great database of old advertising. Ads are the economy's diary. And speaking of advertising, Time Out New York now has ads on our New York blogs. This is our first metro-specific order. Expect lots more.
[6] comments (3952 views) | link
Who will edit the editors? Bloggers.
Jeff Jarvis edits an editor and the reader wins.
[4] comments (3110 views) | link
Credit cards and new terms
We're moving towards adding credit card payments for Blogads. As part of this process, we're considering a couple of tweaks to our terms. Your comments welcome.
Our ideas:
a) if a blogger rejects an order that has been paid for with credit card, the blogger will be charged the processing fee charged by the company (Worldpay) we'll use to process card payments. On a $50 payment, this might be $2, but we hope any potential losses are far outweighed by higher sales volumes.
b) we'd like put a $15 floor on ad sales. This will help keep us from getting chewed up by processing fees. If you'd like to remain open for really cheap advertisers, you could consider making your one week price $0.00.
[10] comments (3309 views) | link
Friendship offline and on
Kind words from friend Steve Locke. With Steve and Gina, we've stayed full of pizza and wine and laughter through Amherst's bleak winter, no-show spring and glowing summer.
I'm convinced blogs will help us stay close, just as blogs have kept me happily in contact with wonderful people like Amy, Matt, Emmanuelle, Ken, Nick,Ben, Rick and Doug who I last lived close to a decade or so ago.
Pixels don't beat proximity, but they can augment the heck out of it. Which reminds me I've got to post something soon about blogs as a personality prosthesis, a neat metaphor offered by Lee Barstow.
Hey, that reminds me it's time for me to make my annual plea to college friends to each get a blog. OK, enough rambling. Back to work.
[4] comments (2946 views) | link
The price of a conversation
Lee Barstow quipped recently that a "conversation is worth a thousand e-mails." Wise words. I've been having fun using the phone more recently. Using Vonage for calls (free in the US and 5 cents to UK and France) has certainly lowered the cost of talking.
[5] comments (2810 views) | link
New tune
Sitting at the table after dinner last night, we heard our son in the living room fiddling around. He came in and said, "I've learned a new song." Frowning slightly and pausing occasionally to correct himself, he played Gavotte by Martini, a violin tune he'd heard ten times on his CD player and had never practiced before. This is the first time we've seen him do this. Amazing.
I've told my wife that in patiently and persistently shepherding our kids through music lessons she's accomplished something far more valuable and tangible than anything I've built in business.
[4] comments (2867 views) | link
New social structure for dissemination of ideas
Cameron Marlow, creator of Blogdex, writes: "Webloggers are a great leading indicator of trends in the news simply by being part of a group that intends to keep each other informed." And adds, "As a community, this is the first time researchers have been able to track the spread of ideas through an informal social network in such a large proportion. I'm hoping to describe the process by which information spreads by epidemic proportions, namely the properties of the information itself and the social structure that enables it."
It's a new world.
[4] comments (2827 views) | link
Rising rates: Black Monday for home prices?
Bond yields have jumped 1.10 percentage points in the last six weeks. In relative terms, the rise is equal in severity to the rise that led to the stock market crash of October 1987.
Unfortunately, the NYTimes article I'm citing doesn't mention Japanese arbitrage sellers or the rocketting the projected Federal deficit. Both mean lots more bonds for sale, but myopic economists ignore these factors because they prefer to think "interest rates" are driven by "economic variables" and not raw supply and demand for debt instruments.
Since June 13, the US Treasure ten year note has risen from 3.11% to 4.21%. That 35% rise in yield is nearly as severe in relative terms as the rise in ten year note yields (from 6.98% to 10.23%) that occured in the nine months before October 19, 1987... known to many as Black Monday. Go read this Black Monday chronology. Here's the entry for January 1, 1987: "The year opens with bond yields near their lowest levels in nine years."
Stocks may well get hit this time around too as the rate at which investors discount future earnings rises, but the dividend tax abatement may counterbalance this effect.
Another asset is more likely to get gored now: homes. Falling federal borrowing and rising tax revenues meant rates could tumble in the 1990s, and falling rates boosted everyone's house price as buyers could afford more house for their money.
Now that the government will be issuing $1.4 trillion more securities in the coming two years than the prior two years, borrowing costs will rise and housing prices must fall. Here's the math: if the rate on a 30 year mortgage rise from 4.5% to 5.5%, a family that can afford a $1013 monthly payment will pay only $179,000 for a house rather than $200,000.
If I were a Democratic Presidential candidate, I'd jump all over the escalating deficit ("driven by reckless Republican fat-cat tax cuts and defense industry sweetheart deals"), since it is going to crush housing prices.
[4] comments (3259 views) | link
e-Influentials prefer web to print ~ 2 to 1
"Influentials," the 10% of the population that leads the other 90%, are over-represented online, according to a Roper survey commissioned by WashingtonPost.com. (If the Post is trying to influence web influentials, why put the findings in 1.2MB PDF?)
The numbers are grim, if you're stranded in print. When "online influentials" wanted to "learn more about topics that interest me" 87% turned first to the web, with 50% turning second to magazines. For "sharing views and opinions" 51% turned to the web and 19% turned second to newspapers.
But the numbers can be read as negative even for traditional publishers like WP with strong online strategies, says entrepreneur Arnold Kling. He points out "The Roper study appears to be commissioned as a way to help convince advertising agencies to buy on the Web. But the typical Web ads are Old Media, and my guess is that they do not affect the 'influentials' very much." Too bad the Roper folks didn't think to ask about blogs. (Thanks Hylton.)
[5] comments (3088 views) | link
Ads make sense
Edward Rothstein, reviewing the new three-volume, $385, 1,873 page Advertising Age Encyclopedia of Advertising in the New York Times, writes"...the ordinary academic model of advertising and its effects is inadequate. Advertisements are a form of communication, not mere manipulation: they help make sense of the world, defining its differences and essences, filtering through its variety, making claims and constructing images."
[4] comments (2849 views) | link
Blue light special on blogads...
For a limited time only: Blogsearchengine.com is offering free one week Blogads. He's got 1700 visitors a day and growing fast. (Update: the free ad offer is now closed.)
[4] comments (2934 views) | link
Boston notes
Great day in Boston. A blur of caffeine and syllables.
David Weinberger introduced me to Zaftigs. I've wanted to chew the fat (or as things turned out, an egg sandwich) with David since meeting him briefly in Vienna at Blogtalk. His Small Pieces Loosely Joined expresses the genius of the Internet's imperfection and he's an author of the Cluetrain Manifesto, one of the sparks that lit my first blog post. David showed me the Palm pilot he'd just run over.
Next I had coffee with Biz Stone in Wellesley, where he's designing and sneaking blogs into that Ivory tower. Damn, Biz is a genius and his name is Biz. Turns out the only thing not to be taken seriously about Biz is his blog's photo.
Next I dropped by the office of a Pressflex investor who shall remain surnameless. (Welcome to blogs, Glover. Here's the Gelernter post I mentioned.)
Finally, I hung out with Hylton Jolliffe, the micropublishing impressario of Corante. We compared notes at the Miracle of Science Bar and Grill near MIT between runs to stuff coins into parking meters. We brainstormed about how blogs might leverage tactics from newsletters and conferences.
As I mentioned at the outset of this post, the day was a blur. My lasting memory: bloggers are, as a group, smarter, wittier, humbler, more social, more articulate and more ambitious than the average Joe. Bloggers together make a formidible army.
[6] comments (3014 views) | link
On the road again
Offline in Boston today. Reachable on mobile at 413 441 3098.
[4] comments (3123 views) | link
US follows Japanese rates higher, stranding US economy?
Some economists say we shouldn't worry that interest rates have jumped a full percentage point in the last six weeks. They rationalize: while this rise will undoubtedly stifle the booming housing market -- the only sector keeping the economy afloat for the last 18 months -- rates must be up because the rest of the economy is finally recovering. No worries.
What these guys don't appreciate is how much the rise in rates may be driven by other forces. First, the federal budget has swung to a massive deficit: the Treasury will need to borrow nearly 1.4 trillion dollars more in the next two years than the last two years. That's a boatload of bonds, and plentiful supply means lower prices: higher interest rates.
Second, much of the recent jump is driven by massive Japanese dumping of long-term US treasuries. Over the last decade of Japanese depression, Japanese banks have made a habit of borrowing yen at nearly 0% and buying US treasuries.
But the Japanese stock market is up nearly 30% since June. As Japanese ten year bond yields have risen 100% in recent months, from 0.5% to 1%, the yield arbitrage from Japan to the US has become less secure, and a major buyer of treasures becomes a big seller: ergo higher rates.
My bet is that Greenspan is more worried than ever.
[4] comments (2919 views) | link
No-frills ads for no-frills companies...
Reading today's Wall Street Journal article about the no-frills inhouse advertising produced by budget airlines Ryanair and Easyjet reminded me that part of what makes a blogad good -- spontaneity, cheapness and even a little human roughness -- can be part of what makes a company good.
"'Amateurism is definitely part of [a budget airline's] charm,' said Guy Abrahams, director of strategy at media-consulting firm Carat Group. '[Cheap advertising] is to maintain their brand-name image as a no-frills airlines as much as or possibly even more than to save money.' Although companies in other sectors are starting to do ads themselves, David Fletcher, head of research at mediaedge:cia, says he doesn't see it as a major trend. Do-it-yourself advertising is for companies -- such as mail-order firms or direct-response advertisers -- that don't need to produce high-quality ads and have business models in line with a no-frills philosophy, he says."
It's worth remembering that eBay and Google have always gone out of their way to appear simple and human-scale. No doubt, advertising on blogs -- p2p, cheap and cheerful, spontaneous, risk-friendly -- can help reinforce a brand's association with those qualities. In short, glitz and blogads don't mix.
[4] comments (3354 views) | link
Ben Franklin on offensive ads
Lee Barstow pointed me to Ben Franklin's Apology for Printers, something Franklin wrote in 1731 after an advertisement he'd taken in his Pennsylvania Gazette offended some churchgoers. He wrote: "Being frequently censur'd and condemn'd by different Persons for printing Things which they say ought not to be printed, I have sometimes thought it might be necessary to make a standing Apology for my self...."
Franklin continues, "I request for all who are angry with me on the Account of printing things they don't like, calmly to consider these following particulars: 1) That the opinions of men are almost as various as their faces... 5) ... that when Truth and Error have fair Play, the former almost always is an overmatch for the lattter: Hence [printers] chearfully serve all contending Writers that pay them well, without regarding on which side they are of the Question in Dispute."
Finally, my favorite part: "That I got Five Shillings by [the ad]. That none who are angry with me would have given me so much to let it alone. That if all the People of different Opinions would engage to give me as much for not printing things they don't like, as I can get by printing them, I should probably live a very easy Life; and if all Printers were every where so dealt by, there would be very little printed." (Franklin's essay linked from this page.)
[4] comments (3411 views) | link
Flash: Google is 150% of search market
Today's WSJ profiles the Google's awesome power and leads with analyst comScore's estimate that Google does 32% of the roughly four billion searches done online each month.
The only problem with this: Google itself says it does "more than 200 million searches a day." Which means Google accounts 150% of each month's searches. :)
Frankly, I think that the 200 million number is still low, but I guess it serves Google well to leave its competitors and analysts so deeply in the dark. No doubt, Google will make a nice splash declaring that "the search market is actually twice as big as you think" when the company eventually goes public.
For a brief chronicle of the trouble journalists have had thinking critically about Google's numbers, read this post.
[4] comments (3134 views) | link
Sharecropping content...
Tim Bray urges software developers to avoid being sharecroppers, people who farm someone else's land using tools and seed provided by the owner. The sharecropper gets a share of the crops, but has little control. "It’s a lousy position to be in, because you’re never going to make much, and if the land’s owner finds something better to do with the land, you’re history."
Are You a Sharecropper? If you’re developing software for the Windows platform, yes. Or for the Apple platform, or the Oracle platform, or the SAP platform, or, well, any platform that is owned and operated by a company. They own the ground you’re building on, and if they decide they don’t like you, or they can do something better with the ground, you’re toast. They can ship their own product and give it away till you go bust, then start charging for it; and use secret APIs you can’t see; and they can break the published APIs you use. All of these things have historically been done by platform vendors.On the other hand, "You’re not a sharecropper, especially not a sharecropper, if you’re building on the Web platform. If you can define your value-add as a series of interactions via a browser, or an interchange of XML messages, nobody can whip the land out from under you." (Thanks to Kevin Burton of Newsmonster for pointing Bray's article out to me.)
This metaphor is very relevant for content providers now getting paid per click to run Google-mediated text ads. Google is turning publishers into sharecroppers. Google owns the relationship with the client -- the advertiser -- and has reduced the value of content to its "clickness." Whether you are the New York Times or Joe Blog, you don't have a brand anymore as far as Google advertisers are concerned, you are an anonymous provider of clicks. You can't demand a premium for the quality of your reader -- he's just another anonymous clicker. You can't demand a premium of the quality of the community you've worked so hard to meld -- its just a disaggregated bunch of eyeballs.
You are only as good as your clickthrus and Google can always find someone else's reasonably relevant content to piggyback if you don't like the terms Google offers. After all, where else are you going to go to find 100,000 context-relevant advertisers?
How much did Google tell you they are sharing from that clickthru? They didn't say? Oh, sorry.
[5] comments (3085 views) | link
Another Amherst blogger
Welcome Lee: "I am excited to have this new facet of identity. I'm also excited to have the forum since, as my family, friends, and acquaintances will tell you, I have more to say than anyone wants to hear."
[5] comments (2979 views) | link
Democratic, amazing and so cool...
Greg Beato writes: "One of the great benefits of blogads is that they essentially democratize media buying. It's expanding the number of venues where small advertisers can afford to run ads."
Oliver Griswold writes: "Thanks for all this amazing technology!"
After ordering an ad, Ginger Mayerson writes: "This was great fun! Blogads are so cool, they need sweaters."
[5] comments (2843 views) | link
Crooked lumber: academic grumbling
Finally, a blog my father might enjoy: Crooked lumber. Now, if I can find something for Mom.
[4] comments (2986 views) | link
Blog love rubs off on advertisers
More proof sponsorships running on beloved blogs are a marketing dream come true: "12 percent of High Affinity visitors [ie people who really like a site] recalled online ads for the test brands compared to only 7 percent of Low/Medium Affinity visitors. High Affinity visitors are even more likely to recall online advertising for the test brands when supported by increased ad frequency. At a high frequency (5+), 15 percent of High Affinity visitors recalled seeing online ads for the test brands vs. only 4 percent of Low/Medium Affinity visitors."
[4] comments (3453 views) | link
Mega@#$fizzle
Overwhelmed by jargon, consumers are slow to buy new technology. The same no doubt applies to sales of online advertising, which is a challenge for us wordsmiths. What is a CPM or a clickthru? This is one of the reasons that Blogads sticks to selling advertisingin blocks of time.
[4] comments (3277 views) | link
Better than a Honda
More proof that advertising can be art. (Via Up2speed.)
[4] comments (3111 views) | link
CSS explanation
Turns out our CSS is less intuitive than we thought. Yes, Blogads CSS is completely customizable. No, if you do it right, Blogads CSS won't impact your site's "regular" CSS. Yes, you can have different adstrips with different CSSes on the same page.
Here's our new explanation of the potential of Blogads' CSS. Any thoughts? Write Tamas-at-pressflex.com.
[5] comments (3070 views) | link
Always-On people's nerves...
Just noticed that blog-poseur Tony Perkins has resorted to telemarketing VCs (at 5.30AM!) for his coming Always-On conference.
This tactic seems odd, since the Always-On "blog" -- I wish there was some way to capitalize quotation marks -- is supposed to already serve all the cognoscenti of Silicon Valley.
Perhaps some blog advertising would be a more effective promotional tactic, Tony?
(Disclosure Part I: Tony was pretty disgruntled when I ragged him back in March for claiming he'd created "the next level of blogging," which was, in fact, "a last-gasp of print publishing." Disclosure part II: Tony ultimately apologized (see comments of this post) for his petulance. Disclosure Part III: Always-On still misses most of the attributes, listed in my first critique of the site, that make blogs great.)
[4] comments (3083 views) | link
Blogads: now horizontal and RSS!
After some experimentation, we've now got horizontal Blogads running on Ben Hammersley's blog.
With Ben's expert help, we've also got advertising running in his blog's RSS feed, which is a first, we believe. ("What's RSS?" my father will ask. Read Ben's Guardian artice for a good overview.)
Ben notes, "you'll have noticed the return of the blogads at the tops of the pages. Hell, a man's gotta eat, and keep his hounds in the manner to which they have become accustomed. Are dogs meant to be that enthusiastic for brie? Buy an ad, and keep my dogs in fine cheese. Ahem, yes." Ben's moving to Florence in a couple days and I've promised to visit with some luscious American cheese.
After massaging out any kinks, we'll make these new gizmos available to all weblog ad sellers.
[5] comments (3334 views) | link
Junior year...
The number of people officially out of work for a week or more is at its highest level since I was a junior in college. Ages ago.
[4] comments (3033 views) | link
Genius on the half-shell (and cheap)
Ken Layne is now selling his new old album, 14 songs he recorded in the 1990s.
Since I know (marginally) more about business than music, I'll first note that Ken has copied Dr. Frank and picked $8 as his pricing point. In this age of Internet marketing and infinite copiability, this price sounds far more reasonable than the $19.99 or whatever the pre-digital minded record industry folks still try to foist on us. Online purchases should be impulse buys... and to me $8 seems much more like an impulse buy (a big meal at McDonalds or a couple of pints at the local brewery) than $20, which is almost the cost of an entree at a nice (non-NY) restaurant.
If you scroll down his album page, you can read my mutterings about Ken's musicianship. Buy one or two. How often do you get to own a nice durable chunk of genius for the price of dinner at McDs?
[4] comments (3376 views) | link
Cool idea
A clever nascent essay on the anthropology of fridges (and people who write about them.)
[4] comments (3170 views) | link
Adsense datapoint...
With some bloggers bragging about their revenues from Google Adsense, it's worth remembering that not everyone is bragging. I just talked to a blogger who is making the equivalent of $0.16 CPMs from Adsense. Most advertising, yes Blog advertising too, is about a lot more than utility, folks. Don't let advertisers blindly undervalue your loyal communities.
[5] comments (4182 views) | link
Drowning in a sea of impressions...
I just had an interesting chat with a substantial advertiser who is considering buying a big package of blogads. Turns out he's fed up with advertising on sites like MSN.com. "I bought 29 million page impressions and made 29 sales -- there's gotta be a better way," he said.
[4] comments (3478 views) | link
Horizontal adstrip
For those of you who have asked for a horizontal adstrip, we're working on something. Take a look at this horizontal strip of blog advertising and drop me a line or leave a comment.
[6] comments (2860 views) | link
Nixon rates the Dems
Safire channels Nixon (via cellphone from purgatory): "Kerry can't smile and Lieberman smiles too much. Gephardt has no eyebrows and Edwards comes across as tricky. Dean would be a godsend for us, blowing his cool in debate. Joe Biden would give Bush the most trouble, but he's waiting too long. Gotta run to Keynes's class. Where's the damn button to turn this thing off?"
[4] comments (3349 views) | link
Watching business battles from the top
The normal view "is that once a leader decides on war, he should stand aside and let the generals fight it without political interference. This view is analogous to the terror of micromanaging that is a standard feature of the advice in business books in recent years. The idea is that a chief executive is supposed to think big thoughts, set direction and then let people do their jobs without interference. Indeed, nowadays the chief executive is supposed to be a coach and a cheerleader more than anything else. In wartime, according to Mr. Cohen, that is nonsense. In four fascinating case studies, the author demonstrates that Lincoln, Clemenceau, Churchill and Ben-Gurion continually challenged and questioned their generals, mastered immense quantities of detail and, in important instances, overruled their advice. In all four cases, Mr. Cohen shows that these habits played a crucial role in achieving victory." (Link)
[4] comments (3192 views) | link
Diverticulated vision
"ACCORDING to research compiled by David E. Meyer, a psychology professor at the University of Michigan, multitaskers actually hinder their productivity by trying to accomplish two things at once. Mr. Meyer has found that people who switch back and forth between two tasks, like exchanging e-mail and writing a report, may spend 50 percent more time on those tasks than if they work on them separately, completing one before starting the other."
I'm sometimes guilty of this and agree that it is bad. My rationalization: I don't want to be the bottleneck in partner or colleague projects; I'm sacrificing my efficiency for theirs. Umm... usually.
The NYTimes introduces a bunch of tech characters who claim to be more successful, more vibrant, more competitive because they are multitasking. These guys usually sound like self-deceiving boobs, particularly the guy who uses his wireless-enabled laptop, BlackBerry and mobile phone while having imaginary dogfights with his five-year-old son.
"Both love the game, and it has an added benefit for Dad: he can play with one hand while using the other to talk on the phone or check e-mail. The multitasking maneuver occasionally requires a trick: although Mr. Mehlman usually lets his son win the Lego air battles, he sometimes allows himself to win, which forces his son to spend a few minutes putting his plane back together. 'While he rebuilds his plane, I check my e-mail on the BlackBerry,' Mr. Mehlman explained." (He's got two other kids too.)
[5] comments (3583 views) | link
Ads as art
"Advertising is the ultimate performance art," says copywriter John Kuraoka in a permalinkless June 19 post. (Via Scott Knowles.)
[4] comments (2969 views) | link
Ashes from fireworks
The fireworks finale last night sent a rain of ash down on us. L recovered a scrap of paper fireworks casing from our blanket and hauled it home. "I like the smell." We sat with families Locke Locke and Srmecs. Spent all day yesterday in the neighborhood pool.
While running through a swamp this morning, I wondered why we didn't get munched by mosquitoes last night. Could it be that mosquitoes are drawn upward by the flash and roar and carbon dioxide... and then obliterated by the next round of flashes?
[4] comments (2987 views) | link
Happy July 4th
 |
To celebrate, I bought Hugh Macleod's beautiful rendition of the American flag. I've always loved Jasper Johns' flags, and have been eyeing Hugh's flag for a couple of weeks. The original is in the mail, but I do have the digital version to hoist here today. Ck it out: Hugh has shaken up his pricing -- beauty comes in many prices.
Feel free to hoist this flag on your site; please give credit to Hugh Macleod ...
[5] comments (3930 views) | link
Don't talk and drive
A study by Public Administration for Traffic Safety of Spain and the Complutense University in Madrid finds that "intent listening had almost no effect on how closely the drivers paid attention to the road and the dashboard. But when the drivers were asked to talk about what they had heard, their ability to pay attention dropped by as much as a third. Even relatively simple production tasks, like relating where they were and what they were doing, had about as big an effect as requests that the researchers considered more complicated. The study found that the distraction levels were equally high when the driver was talking to a passenger or into a hands-free cellphone."
[4] comments (3489 views) | link
A socialist sysadmin's view of the Blogads 'plague'
I always love it when people gripe about advertising, particularly when Blogads gets slammed in the process. So here's a nice anti blog ad screed from one Steve Hooker, a UK government employee:
Though I have a degree in graphics and advertising I've always been against advertising. Just my socialist background finds them distasteful. It's whoever can spend enough money fooling people that their can of beans is best, not that that can is best for the person. Trickery, slight of hand, bending the truth, that's what ads are for... If ads start to plague [link to Blogads] blogs, the near-utopian world we have right now may disappear.Yes, Steve, God forbid that writers should get 80% of what advertisers pay, rather than the 5-10% usually passed along by traditional publishers.
I guess Steve, a guy who has the luxury of working as an "intranet builder for Government Office of West Midlands," probably rarely faces the challenge of selling anything to anyone other than his boss or wife... so has his fingers firmly on the pulse of economic reason. It's easy for him to think that the rest of us should do as he does.
[Update: whoops, Steve's an entrepreneur and a nice guy. See his comment below. So much for pre-breakfast snarkiness.]
I assume Steve gets to work on a bike he built himself -- Marx forbids he buy one that some lying corporation "convinced" him to drive -- or better yet, walks barefoot. He drinks only tap water, since it's the only beverage not contaminated by the slime of advertising.
Fact is, most of the products that make modernity comfortable for folks other than the elite are objects and experiences we didn't know we'd need, things no central planner could have imagined people would ever want or afford. Each product started out as a twinkle in the eye of some deranged entrepreneur, then got tested on the entrepreneur's friends and family and finally got popularized through -- cover your ears Steve -- advertising.
This dialectic of invention and advertising, product creation and demand stimulation, was good... unless you think products like refrigerators, pocket cameras, automobiles, air travel and personal computers should be used only by rich folk AND designed only by government employees. Yes, here's a souvenir of the pre-mass-market-advertising utopio:
 |
In fact, Steve's post isn't all idiocy. (In fact, he seems to be a cheerful guy and good father when you read the rest of his blog.) I agree with Steve's final point: "The point of blogging is not to make money from eye-balls, not IMO. It maybe to make money from thought and intellect or reputation sure, nothing wrong with making money. But CPMs are eye-ball traffic, lowest common denominator." If blogs are going to achieve their rightful advertising premiums, we're going to have to demonstrate that they do more than provide cheap eye-balls or high clickthrus... MSN will always have more eyeballs and Drudge can always undercut our CPM. Bloggers who strive to will make money because they provide, amid the clutter and cacaphony of online life, a uniquely intimate and consistent context for entrepreneurs who need to popularize innovative ideas and intangibles.
[13] comments (3569 views) | link