USERS  
  Log-In  
  Register  
  Members  


Archives: May 2004

Blog reader survey slices

Eve and

Adam.

Note that the women are 10 years older and earn more.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 25, 04 | 10:34 am | Profile

[5] comments (3797 views)  |  link

Latest blogad

I glimpse most of the blogads as they shoot into our database. This one just came through to run on MyDD:

A first-time Democratic candidate is out-raising the son of a former Senator by a 4-to-1 margin thanks to blogads! Help the only state legislative candidate in the blogosphere beat a silver spoon Republican. No office is a birthright or a stepping stone. Drop $20.04 in her hat.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 24, 04 | 4:45 pm | Profile

[5] comments (3538 views)  |  link

World turned upside down

When a White House operative code-named Deep Throat wanted to blow the whistle on CREEPiness in 1972, he had to arrange clandestine meetings with Woodward and Bernstein of the Washington Post.

In January 1998, the Monica Lewinsky story broke when proto-blogger Matt Drudge spilled the beans Newsweek had carefully gathered.

Now, Monica's 21st century equivalent, a Hill staffer getting paid for sex by a Bush government agency appointee, told her story on her own blog, Washingtonienne.com, detailing her lifestyle and budget. (I haven't bothered linking the blog, since it has been taken down.)

And she's got a blogging Boswell, Wonkette, who turned the spotlight on the shenanigans. Washington Post gossip columnist [url=http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A48909-2004May22.html]Richard Leiby
[/url] is playing catch-up on the story, but is covered in Wonkette's dust.

See the photo of the two not-so-ingenue bloggers out for a drink Saturday night. Wonkette closes her post: "(P.S. Top that, Leiby.)"

PPS Top that, corporate press. The game is over when sources have blogs.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 23, 04 | 8:42 pm | Profile

[4] comments (3388 views)  |  link

Sunday AM reading

Feels good when a friend starts blogging. You learn more about them, and are enriched by extra exposure to their humor and wisdom. So a shout-out to my neighbor Doug Tidwell, who gets to globe-trot for IBM preaching to college kids. Our daughters are in Indian Princesses together.

Meanwhile, in Amherst, Steve survives the voyage to Plymouth on a vessel full of 4th graders.

BTW, here's a nicely biased article analyzing why Princeton or Harvard (or other schools) haven't monopolized the White House recently.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 23, 04 | 8:06 am | Profile

[4] comments (3220 views)  |  link

Blog reader survey results

Blog reader survey results. Lots of fun surprises. More on the way next week as we slice the data.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 21, 04 | 3:24 pm | Profile

[6] comments (3366 views)  |  link

10,000 reader responses and counting

At 8:35, the 10,000th blog reader responded to our survey. The 10,000 reader came from Sean Bonner's blog.

The 20 readers leading up to the 10,000th were sent by The Agitator, Hit&Run, Instapundit, E-Media Tidbits, Atrios, Washington Monthly, Joshua Claybourn, RogerLSimon, PoliticalWire, A Small Victory, Blackfive and Amy Langfield.

Some recent studies show that women surf more at night; men prowl by day. Perhaps that is why the male skew dropped overnight from 80.1 to 79.6%. The average testosterone of blog readers is still astonishing to me -- the New York Times' online readership skews only 56% male.

Anil Dash noted in Steve Outing's comments yesterday that the survey "skewed heavily male because it was linked on some boyzone websites that aren't very hospitable towards women. I bet that'll change as the link disseminates. " We'll see what things look like when the dust settles. I'm still pretty surprised.

Some readers reported that survey pages 2 and 3 were taking minutes to load last night. I'm very sorry. I've contacted Surveymonkey's support and hope this is something can be fixed, because I'd like to keep the survey running at least through the end of today.

To wrap up, thank you to the 10,000 blog readers who have been generous with your time and answers!

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 18, 04 | 8:33 am | Profile

[11] comments (4719 views)  |  link

Blog reader survey

A couple of hours ago, responses started rolling in for our long overdueblog reader survey. Thank you to Atrios, Instapundit, DailyKos, PoliticalAnimal, Agonist, Asmallvictory, andRogerLSimon for sending readers to the survey.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 17, 04 | 1:46 pm | Profile

[7] comments (4037 views)  |  link

Ranting for profit

A mention of blogads in a succinct Newsweek article called Ranting for profit.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 16, 04 | 11:27 pm | Profile

[5] comments (3071 views)  |  link

Nest of vipers

D'Amato spins a superb tale about a Budapest night-spot, the Feszek Klub. Unmentioned: behind a locked door on the third floor is a 100 foot diameter circular room. Painted reflective gold in the 60's, it's got some Grecian motifs and a shallow dome spanning the whole space -- right out of the Martian Chronicles. Peter Molnar and I staged a blast there in 1992, a party was unmatched in fervent novelty until Matt and Emmanuelle (and Jim Lowney?) rented the outdoor pool -- with surf! -- at the Gellert Hotel in 1997. Those were the days, my friend.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 16, 04 | 10:43 pm | Profile

[4] comments (3310 views)  |  link

Entrepreneurship: hustling and groveling

The risk of carving a startup out of a big company, says one VC in a story in this morning's NYT , "is that you're taking on people who haven't been out there hustling, groveling for a living. They're not necessarily entrepreneurs."

Sitting here at 5.30AM waiting for one image server to be revived, I have to smile.

8AM update: Image server Sparrow (our other two are named Cuckoo and Rooster) is flying again.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 15, 04 | 5:29 am | Profile

[4] comments (3211 views)  |  link

When a tree doesn't fall in the forest

A reader criticizes Josh Marshall for not decrying Nicholas Berg's murder. Marshall responds:

You've just misjudged how I run the site and why I do so. I don't write about everything I think. I don't write just to say that X is good or Y is bad. I write when I feel I have something I can add to a discussion, and only then. I could write a post saying that I thought Berg's execution was horrifying and awful and that I couldn't get to sleep last night because the ugliness of the images wouldn't leave my mind. But what would that tell you? That al Qaida is awful and that I think they're awful too? Perhaps I simply have nothing to add. The online world has lots of vociferous me-too-ism, going on record saying in fist-clenched tones things I think we all know we all feel. That's fine; I just don't like doing that. Once, when I wrote nothing about a rapid series of court decisions touching on gay rights issues, one reader wrote in and attacked me mercilessly for being homophobic since clearly, he reasoned, I had judged these to be of no importance. He was wrong; and you've made the same misjudgment. This isn't a publication of record. And you're not in a position to judge what I think based on my silence.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 14, 04 | 6:30 am | Profile

[12] comments (3190 views)  |  link

Out of control

Headlines on CNNfn.com this morning:

Stocks sink softly

Oil near $41 a barrel

Wholesale prices up

Retail sales slow

Jobless claims rise


You know that stomach-bending time-is-really-slow-and-how-will-this-end feeling you get when the car spins out of control on black ice?

That's the feeling Greenspan has right now.

He hasn't tightened rates, and 10 year note rates are up 100 basis points in six weeks. That's huge, with more probably to come. The Fed can't not tighten, with inflation on every front. But Greenspan, who spent the 70s and 80s examining the huge impact that housing markets have on the national economy, also knows that tightening will crush home sales and dunk the economy faster than a lead fishing sinker.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 13, 04 | 11:00 am | Profile

[12] comments (3076 views)  |  link

Uncorporate journalists heading to DNConvention

You've heard that the DNC is credentialing uncorporate journalists, aka bloggers. Some great stories will emerge, but I'm also hoping weird angles get covered, making corporate journalists groan or harrumph.

Throughout it all, the best/cheapest/maddest place to advertise will be here. Remember, uncorporate doesn't mean noncommercial -- just means you don't have to pay for 11 layers of corporate overhead to push ads to your target audience.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 12, 04 | 8:25 am | Profile

[13] comments (3202 views)  |  link

Two photos from Hungary

pic
Lunch with Zalan, 2.5 year old son of Miklos and Marie-Eve.

pic
The food was great.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 11, 04 | 12:19 pm | Profile

[14] comments (3556 views)  |  link

Blog advertising = fast and furious

One of the things that most excites me about blog advertising is its immediacy.

Blogs are fast, furious and unmediated. Smart blog advertising leverages these same characteristics.

Take the latest blogad for congressional candidate Jim Newberry:
pic.

The moral of this story isn't that other Democratic candidates should consider running "Rumsfeld must resign" ads -- although I'm sure a couple will.

The tactics to be copied are topicality and passion: carpe diem. Blogs dare advertisers actually to put their mouths where their money is, to speak immediately and bluntly about the issues of the moment.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 10, 04 | 3:05 pm | Profile

[12] comments (3618 views)  |  link

Blogtalk 2.0

Hope I can make it to Blogtalk this year. I gave a talk there last year and had a fantastic time. The folks organizing Blogtalk are wonderful hosts, and the speakers chew on lots of arcane but essential angles not covered by more commercially driven events. Where else would you find this range?

* Mortensen, Torill Elvira: "Dialogue in slow motion – the pleasure of writing and reading across the web"
* Lumma, Nico: "The German Blogosphere - some facts and figures"
* Schuster, Michael: "Applying Social Network Analysis to a small Weblog Community: Hubs, Power Laws, the Ego Effect and the Evolution of Social Networks"
* Azhar, Azeem/Niederhofer, Max: "Does blogging suck?"

...and Vienna is spectacular.

My presentation last year covered "Blog advertising metrics: passion and hubness.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 10, 04 | 7:25 am | Profile

[13] comments (4598 views)  |  link

Tents to disrupt housing market?

WSJ (May 10) "The trusty old tent isn't just for camping any more. Schools, churches and even prisons are choosing tents over buildings these days because they are cheaper and quicker to erect. A new, elaborate generation of products can accommodate elevators and chandeliers. Instead of canvas, the novel tents have vinyl walls. Instead of poles running up the center, giant metal frames support the structures. Some have doors that lock, windows with screens, wood floors, heating and air-conditioning, and wall-to-wall carpeting. Strong ones can withstand winds of up to 80 miles an hour." ...

"As its membership grew, New Life Church considered putting up a metal or concrete building. But the tent won out because it cost about $800,000 less than a traditional building and shaved four to six months off the construction time. The unconventional design appeals to teenagers, who use the facility for youth-ministry meetings and concerts, says Brian Newberg, financial controller for New Life, which has a main church building, as well."

The subscriber-only article.

For housing the tent has all the classic traits of "disruptive technologies" as defined by Clayton Christensen. Tents are weaker, cheaper, simpler, easier to use, appealing to different types of customers, sold through different sales channels, and migrating quickly up market.

We still rely on stone, concrete and wood, building materials first used by ancient man. Why not dwell in computer-optimized structures and materials?

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 10, 04 | 6:16 am | Profile

[12] comments (4709 views)  |  link

Pushing the envelope

In the drive to raise money for candidates, some folks are playing all the angles. Rewarding his readers for their donations, Atrios links to a photo of boobies for Kerry. What will the FEC say?

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 07, 04 | 10:14 am | Profile

[12] comments (3058 views)  |  link

Open source ad campaign

Film-maker Brian Flemming bought a Blogad on Talkingpointsmemo promoting a book called "Sue Me," which is intended to shame Arnold Schwarzenegger. He's posted the results of the ad campaign so far -- lots of clicks and some of that juicy stuff that PR professionals crave: "earned media." Any revenues from the book campaign will be plowed right back into more advertising.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 06, 04 | 2:12 pm | Profile

[11] comments (3287 views)  |  link

Wpost print loses readers to site

Newspaper circulation declined nationally in the first quarter. The fundamental problem -- there are lots of other places to get the same information.

Some of the steepest declines among big papers were registered by The Washington Post, which lost an average of about 24,000 readers on weekdays (a drop of about 3 percent, to 772,553) and a similar number on Sundays (representing a drop of 2 percent, to 1,025,579.)

Boisfeuillet Jones Jr., publisher and chief executive of The Washington Post, said in a telephone interview that several factors appeared to have contributed to the declines, including a spike in readership during the early months of 2003, which he attributed to interest in the buildup to the war in Iraq.

But citing something of a mixed blessing that will be watched closely by other newspapers, Mr. Jones said that the newspaper's Web site - as well as a free tabloid-size affiliate of the paper, called Express, which was introduced last summer -appeared to be siphoning some readers from the main paper.
Of course, this could just be rationalization. Most publishers see that for every two subscriber's lost to the web, two or three new ones are attracted. But maybe that game is coming to an end, as the marketing effect of having a web site is wearing off.

In any case, if the web is going to be the scapegoat for circulation losses, the Post steps into a difficult paradox: try to make online readers pay, and you'll lose out to the free competition, whether that is NYT or bloggers making fair use of excerpts of online material.

Hey, I love newspapers too. Great editors make a great difference. And newspapers fund lots of investigative stuff that freelancers can't shoulder themselves. I ain't sayin its right, I'm just sayin.

But things ARE changing, even as the industry has been lulled into thinking, "gee, we thought the web was going to kill us all in 1999, I guess we were wrong."

Read Clayton Christensen's Innovator's Dilemma and/or Solution for an excellent framework for understanding the challenge the web poses for traditional publishers. Every now and then an industry is transformed when a cheap, lowpower solution comes along with a lower cost structure, different marketing channels and (intially) different customers who are ignored by the current marketplace... then the "disruptive" solution slowly improves and knaws into the muscle of the existing market.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 04, 04 | 9:34 am | Profile

[11] comments (3238 views)  |  link

Trivia

My favorite reading online these days is about the random minutia of people's lives. Matt gives a bullet point rundown of last weekend in the car and motel. Steve gets ready to mow the lawn and plays with slotcar memories. Rick discovers a new hitch for his bike.

What minutia can I share here? Have set up a new wifi for the house. Steeling myself to buy a lawn mower. Reading lots of Simenon. Ordered a new laptop to replace the creaking hulk I currently hawl around: $1100 at Dell with a nice battery and some obligatory MS software. I'm looking forward to testing Vonage softphone -- does anyone know whether it stands up to wifi? Finally, Pirates now 3/0. After a game and scrimmage Saturday, we spent an hour tossing the ball -- grounders and popups -- in the soft rain, getting ourselves and the ball nicely coated in red clay.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 04, 04 | 9:00 am | Profile

[4] comments (2905 views)  |  link

From the front line nearest home

Excruciating.

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 03, 04 | 5:46 pm | Profile

[9] comments (3308 views)  |  link

Google filing minutia... and the missing metric

The net revenues generated from the fees advertisers pay us when users click on ads that we have delivered to our Google Network members’ web sites represented approximately 15% of our net revenues in 2003, and approximately 21% of our net revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2004, and we expect this percentage to increase in the future.

...

If we fail to detect click-through fraud, we could lose the confidence of our advertisers, thereby causing our business to suffer.
We are exposed to the risk of fraudulent clicks on our ads. We have regularly paid refunds related to fraudulent clicks and expect to do so in the future. If we are unable to stop this fraudulent activity, these refunds may increase. If we find new evidence of past fraudulent clicks we may have to issue refunds retroactively of amounts previously paid to our Google Network members. This would negatively affect our profitability, and these types of fraudulent activities could hurt our brand. If fraudulent clicks are not detected, the affected advertisers may experience a reduced return on their investment in our advertising programs because the fraudulent clicks will not lead to potential revenue for the advertisers. This could lead the advertisers to become dissatisfied with our advertising programs, which could lead to loss of advertisers and revenue.

We are susceptible to index spammers who could harm the integrity of our web search results.
There is an ongoing and increasing effort by “index spammers” to develop ways to manipulate our web search results. For example, because our web search technology ranks a web page’s relevance based in part on the importance of the web sites that link to it, people have attempted to link a group of web sites together to manipulate web search results. We take this problem very seriously because providing relevant information to users is critical to our success. If our efforts to combat these and other types of index spamming are unsuccessful, our reputation for delivering relevant information could be diminished. This could result in a decline in user traffic, which would damage our business.

...

More individuals are using non-PC devices to access the Internet, and versions of our web search technology developed for these devices may not be widely adopted by users of these devices.

The number of people who access the Internet through devices other than personal computers, including mobile telephones, hand-held calendaring and email assistants, and television set-top devices, has increased dramatically in the past few years. The lower resolution, functionality and memory associated with alternative devices make the use of our products and services through such devices difficult. If we are unable to attract and retain a substantial number of alternative device users to our web search services or if we are slow to develop products and technologies that are more compatible with non-PC communications devices, we will fail to capture a significant share of an increasingly important portion of the market for online services.

...

We believe the factors that influence the success of our advertising programs include the following:

• The relevance, objectivity and quality of our search results.

• The number of searches initiated at our web sites or our Google Network members’ web sites.

• The relevance and quality of advertisements displayed with search results on our web sites and of Google Network members’ web sites, or with the content on our Google Network members’ web sites.

• The total number of advertisements displayed on our web sites and on web sites of Google Network members.

• The rate at which people click on advertisements.

• The number of advertisers.

• The total and per click advertising spending budgets of an advertiser.

• Our minimum fee per click, which is currently $0.05.

• The advertisers’ return on investment from advertising campaigns on our web sites or on the web sites of our Google Network members compared to other forms of advertising.

Advertising revenues made up 77%, 92%, 95% and 96% of our net revenues in 2001, 2002, 2003 and in the three months ended March 31, 2004. We derive the balance of our net revenues from the license of our web search technology, the license of our search solutions to enterprises and the sale and license of other products and services.

...

We have experienced and expect to continue to experience substantial growth in our operations as we seek to expand our user, advertiser and Google Network members bases and continue to expand our presence in international markets. This growth has required the continued expansion of our human resources and substantial investments in property and equipment. Our full-time employee headcount has grown from 284 at December 31, 2001, to 682 at December 31, 2002, to 1,628 at December 31, 2003 and to 1,907 at March 31, 2004. In addition, we have employed a significant number of temporary employees in the past and expect to continue to do so in the foreseeable future. Our capital expenditures have grown from $13.1 million in 2001, to $37.2 million in 2002, to $176.8 million in 2003 and to $86.0 million in the three months ended March 31, 2004. We currently expect to spend at least $250 million on capital equipment, including information technology infrastructure, to manage our operations during 2004. In addition, we anticipate that the growth rate of our costs and expenses, other than stock-based compensation, may exceed the growth rate of our net revenues during 2004. Management of this growth will continue to require the devotion of significant employee and other resources. We may not be able to manage this growth effectively.

...

We expect that international net revenues will continue to grow as a percentage of our total net revenues during 2004 and in future periods. While international revenues accounted for approximately 26% of our total net revenues in 2003 and 30% in the three months ended March 31, 2004, more than half of our user traffic came from outside the U.S.

...

[how unautomated is google?]
Sales and marketing expenses increased $6.7 million to $47.9 million (or 12.3% of net revenues) in the three months ended March 31, 2004, from $41.2 million (or 13.4% of net revenues) in the three months ended December 31, 2003. This increase in dollars was primarily due to an increase in labor and facilities related costs of $4.9 million mostly as a result of a 14% increase in sales and marketing headcount. The increase in sales and marketing personnel was a result of our on-going efforts to secure new, and to provide support to our existing, advertisers and Google Network members, on a worldwide basis.

...

We have put significant effort into developing our sales and support infrastructure. We maintain 21 sales offices in 11 countries, and we deploy specialized sales teams across 18 vertical markets. We bring businesses into our advertising network through both online and direct sales channels. In all cases, we use technology and automation wherever possible to improve the experience for our advertisers and to grow our business cost-effectively. The vast majority of our advertisers use our automated online AdWords program to establish accounts, create ads, target users and launch and manage their advertising campaigns. Our direct advertising sales team focuses on attracting and supporting companies around the world with sizeable advertising budgets. Our AdSense program follows a similar model. Most of the web sites in the Google Network sign up for AdSense using an automated online process. Our direct sales force focuses on building AdSense relationships with leading Internet companies. Our global support organization concentrates on helping our advertisers and Google Network members get the most out of their relationships with us.

(No mention of how many searches Google performs each day. They've convinced the underwriters (and themselves?) that Google is not a search company, but an advertising network.) More...

Posted by: henrycopeland on May 01, 04 | 6:16 am | Profile

[5] comments (3748 views)  |  link