![]() |
|||||
|
Business Week predicts corporate takeover of blogsYipee. Business Week does a cover story on blogging and predicts that publishers will soon dominate the field. Go ahead and bellyache about blogs. But you cannot afford to close your eyes to them, because they're simply the most explosive outbreak in the information world since the Internet itself. And they're going to shake up just about every business -- including yours. It doesn't matter whether you're shipping paper clips, pork bellies, or videos of Britney in a bikini, blogs are a phenomenon that you cannot ignore, postpone, or delegate. Given the changes barreling down upon us, blogs are not a business elective. They're a prerequisite. (And yes, that goes for us, too.)...So far, so good, eh? Wow, everything is changing. Particularly publishing. To repeat: "The divide between the publishers and the public is collapsing. This turns mass media upside down. It creates media of the masses. How does business change when everyone is a potential publisher? Sounds pretty grim if you are a publisher, doesn't it? In an astonishingly unself-conscious piece of solipsism, the mag cover says "Blogs will change your business," but the following article would better be titled "Blogs will change OUR business," since lots more is said about the changes blogging will wreak on publishers than any of the thousands of other industries in America. Which brings us to BW's punchline/backflip. A prediction: Mainstream media companies will master blogs as an advertising tool and take over vast commercial stretches of the blogosphere.... Take a look at blog advertising today, and it's hard to see a glittering future. Sure, enterprising bloggers make room on their pages for Google-generated ads, known as AdSense, and earn some pocket change.Umm. Guys? A number of indie bloggers already make more each month than you make. And their year-over-year growth trajectory is a lot greater than yours. And they don't have to worry what the boss thinks. And they've each got a brand name people adore. And they've got the lowest overheads in the publishing industry. Who do people want to work for -- your failing industry, or themselves? Allow me a prediction: indie bloggers are going to kick corporate ass. Yes, blogs could be advertising nirvana, admits Business Week: Still, blogs could end up providing the perfect response to mass media's core concern: the splintering of its audience. Advertisers desperate to reach us need to tap niches (because we get together only once a year to watch the Super Bowl). By piggybacking on blogs, they can start working that vast blogocafé, table by table. Smart ones will get feedback, links to individuals -- and their friends. That's every marketer's dream.But never fear, says BW, the corporates will reclaim the field: The big companies have what the bloggers lack. Scale, relations with advertisers, and large sales forces. They can use these forces to sell across all media, from general audience to bloggy niches.Ahh, salesforces. Expensive, inept, lazy salesforces. Bosses. Managers. Lots of flowcharts. This assumes, of course, that blog advertising is like advertising on MSNBC or BusinessWeek.com. Take it from somebody who registered the name "blogads.com" in March of 2002... it isn't. If you think publishing has been transformed, don't you think that its twin sister advertising is also being turned inside out? While traditional advertising is about megaphones and cheerleading, blog advertising is about conversing, listening as much as you talk. Think that the 20-management-tier command-and-control structure of conventional advertisers is going to be comfortable with crawling into this bee-hive? Scale? Who has more scale than the blogosphere? Relationships with advertisers? (Remember the "relationships" that buggy makers used to have with their customers?) To take on bloggers, large publishing corporations (themselves slowly collapsing) will have to re-allign their cost structures, organograms, sales channels and mentalities. Worst of all, they are going to have to cannibalize their own sales. They won't do it. It is not just publishing that is changing. Corporate publishers are going to have to change their relationships with advertisers. Heck, advertisers are going to have to change their relationship with advertising. (Quick, reread http://www.cluetrain.com/#manifesto.) Periodical publishers didn't start making money from Gutenburg's invention until 50 years after his invention, in BW's words, "sparked an information revolution" unrivalled until the invention of blogging. Publishers are three or more years late, just catching on to the ideas we were babbling about three years ago. Publishers haven't caught up-- they are still three years behind. BW writer Heather Green (more on her in a minute) a quote from Clay Shirky that didn't make it into the story: "I am a member of a church of the reform normative, whenever I concentrate on what things should be doing, I miss what things are doing." Here's a parallel factoid that Virginia Postrel www.dynamist.com included in her NYTimes story about innovation last week: a 3M study "found that product ideas from lead users generated eight times the sales of ideas generated internally - $146 million versus $18 million a year - in part because lead users were more likely to come up with ideas for entire new product lines rather than minor improvements." In entrepreneurship, there's a constant and healthy tension between dreaming about the next decade and focusing on today's nitty gritty. The advantage bloggers (and their vendors) have over traditional publishers is that they ARE the users and the lag time between idea and execution is weeks rather than years. And the feedback loop is measured in minutes rather than years. So the innovation cycle is exponentially faster. As regular readers of this blog know, I don't envy the corporate publishing incumbents. Now about Heather Green -- Heather was the first journalist to call about Blogads clear back in September '02 when we sold our first few blogads. The story didn't make it into print.
COMMENTS
|
||||
|
|||||